InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

The Law (f/k/a emz)

12/01/11 11:25 AM

#48766 RE: spike007 #48765

very simple- I think that he is doing the best that he can under less than optimal conditions- he's not a crook, he's not pocketing oogles of dollars at our expense- the BB world is fraught with peril for new CEOs, and he is learning "on the job" and at times from mistakes- happens all of the time-again- I have a different view than most- I'm willing to wait as long as it takes, becuase IF he does get funding and launch etc., I'm gonna make a ton of cash- if he doesn't, I'm gonna lose less than a ton of cash. as to DTCC, he is indeed "working" on it, but I don't expect it to be resolved until early 2012 (just my opinion). Once again- funding/launch sends us to .02s- .03s, and up from there- who wouldn't wait 1, 2, or 3 years or necessary for that kind of POTENTIAL return?
icon url

fink

12/01/11 1:03 PM

#48770 RE: spike007 #48765

Shouldnt he be taking care of the DTCC issue ?



Hate to have my head in the sand, but is there a DTCC issue with us? I thought it were just a TDA issue?

Got this from my locked play.

http://wallstreetbranding.com/

I'm waiting on his reply to see what kind of info he can shed on my halted shares in that camp. It might be just the thing Val needs. He told me the DTCC blows him off and has created massive frustrations for him. Thats so like those guys. Real A-holes.
The DTCC is really getting on my nerves. No accountability,No clear path for a company to take. The SEC needs to open that field up to more than just 3 clearing houses. Stop vapor and air shares and alot can happen. Probably a double edge sword. Restrict those guys and fees go through the roof like the old days. $100s in commission per trade. Man, that was abusive till the 90's.