That article was dated two days ago and had the most recent ethanol futures prices in it. It was about the most informative thing this board has seen in the last month.
You criticize my post because you simply do not want to see any information, be it factual or not, that tends to lessen the attractiveness of PEIX.
If I correct out and out falsehoods such as that book value statement I am criticized. If I post a piece from a respected agricultural journalist, rather than a know-nothing seeking alpha writer, I am critized. The common thread is that any post that presents factual information that reflects poorly on the stock is criticized, regardless of its veracity or relevance.
I have an idea - let's discuss facts rather than the other poster.
The fundamentals speak for themselves here - PEIX is worth $0.50 max.
P.S. If you prefer that my information not be posted then you would be wise to stop replying to my posts as you only motivate me into posting again.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
