A think tank founded by GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich collected at least $37 million over the past eight years from major health-care companies and industry groups, offering special access to the former House speaker and other perks, according to records and interviews.
The Center for Health Transformation [ http://www.healthtransformation.net/ ], which opened in 2003, brought in dues of as much as $200,000 per year from insurers and other health-care firms, offering some of them “access to Newt Gingrich” and “direct Newt interaction,” according to promotional materials. The biggest funders, including firms such as AstraZeneca, Blue Cross Blue Shield and Novo Nordisk, were also eligible to receive discounts on “products and workshops” from other Gingrich groups.
The health center advocated, among other things, requiring that “anyone who earns more than $50,000 a year must purchase health insurance or post a bond,” a type of insurance mandate that has since become anathema to conservatives.
The group also pushed proposals to build centralized electronic medical records and use such data to research treatment effectiveness, both central features of President Obama’s health-care reforms.
The Gingrich campaign referred questions about the center to the think tank. Susan Meyers [ http://healthtransformation.net/cs/SusanMeyers ], a center spokeswoman, declined to comment on the think tank’s income or staffing levels because it is a private-sector organization. She said that neither the center nor Gingrich has engaged in formal lobbying.
Meyers called Gingrich “a health-care visionary” who was advocating far-reaching reforms “before many of these concepts in health care became mainstream.” She said the think tank’s members don’t always agree on specific issues but are working “toward a common vision of saving lives and money.”
“I was approached to offer strategic advice; I was glad to offer strategic advice,” Gingrich told reporters in Iowa this week. “We did it for a number of companies, and Gingrich Group was very successful.”
Mixing policy, marketing
One of the key organizations of the Gingrich Group over the past eight years was the health-care center, an unusual hybrid that married the policy focus of a traditional think tank with Gingrich’s instincts for self-promotion and marketing.
The center attracted a long list of global health-care firms and interest groups, which paid $5,000 to $200,000 a year, based on their size, to be members. Based on archived membership lists going back to 2003, that means the center brought in as much as $6.25 million per year from higher-level members giving $50,000 or more, totaling at least $37 million since 2003.
That does not include many other sources of revenue, such as dues from smaller members and fees for polling, research and other services the center offered.
The center has listed scores of firms and industry groups as members over the years, amounting to a Who’s Who of the medical field, from GE Healthcare to the American Hospital Association to Wellpoint, the nation’s largest health insurer. The think tank also drew funding from employers with sizable health-care costs, such as Detroit’s Big Three automakers, records show.
Several firms characterized their membership as a way to share information about potential health-care reforms.
“We engage with a variety of organizations to participate in public policy discussions on issues impacting our business,” said Tony Jewell, spokesman for drugmaker AstraZeneca, which has been listed as a “founding charter member” since 2005. He said the company is reviewing its membership for next year.
Rick Tyler, a longtime Gingrich spokesman who left as part of a staff exodus from the campaign over the summer, said the think tank “was very successful financially” and played a vital role in promoting free-market solutions for the health-care system. He said Gingrich could have easily cashed in as a registered lobbyist after leaving Congress but chose to try to shape the debate over major public policies instead.
“I don’t think Newt was trying to be an influence-peddler,” Tyler said. “If he had wanted to do that, he could have done that, and he would have been rewarded handsomely for it, I’m sure.”
Although Gingrich gave up ownership of the think tank earlier this year to begin his candidacy, the group still bills him prominently as its founder and sells a long list of Gingrich-related books, videos and other products. Another Gingrich venture, a nonprofit called American Solutions for Winning the Future, closed its doors over the summer amid financial problems.
The Gingrich health center’s support for such a mandate was part of an “Insure All Americans” plan that appears to have disappeared from the center’s Web site Thursday.
Gingrich has characterized his previous support for insurance mandates as a response to President Bill Clinton’s more government-focused health-care proposal in the 1990s, and he has said he turned against the idea.
“I am completely opposed to the Obamacare mandate on individuals,” he says in a recent campaign video. “I fought it for 2-1/2 years at the Center for Health Transformation.”
During a recent interview in South Carolina, Gingrich said that ending his involvement in the health-care think tank and other businesses was difficult. He also said that if he fails to win the Republican nomination, he doesn’t know whether he will “do anything as big as the center” again.
“You know, I’ve made a good deal of my income off the speeches and off of being a commentator,” Gingrich said. “All of that went away. So it just got to be much more challenging.”
Staff writer Karen Tumulty contributed to this report.
Newt Gingrich to Hub occupiers: We are the 100 percent
Former Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney speaks at the Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce. Photo by AP
‘DISORIENTING’: Ex-U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich speaks before a film screening at Harvard University last night. Photo by Chitose Suzuki
By Hillary Chabot Saturday, November 19, 2011
GOP presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich, confronted by Occupy Boston protesters, was grilled about his dislike of Europe and even his past infidelities in a bruising appearance at Harvard University last night that came as a new poll shows him in a virtual tie with rival Mitt Romney for the lead in New Hampshire among likely Republican voters.
“I think we are 100 percent. I think we are all Americans,” Gingrich declared to hecklers, who sarcastically thanked the 68-year old for “standing up for corporations.”
Gingrich brushed off the protest and the tough questions from students, even poking fun later at his own recent rise in the polls.
“Look at our wild and wide-open political and presidential races,” he said, later referring to his own rise as “disorientating.”
“We can’t figure out who the front-runner is because they don’t last long enough,” he joked.
Gingrich’s comments come as a poll, conducted by GOP pollsters Magellan Strategies for the New Hampshire Journal, brings him within striking distance of Romney in a state long-assumed to be an easy win for the former Bay State governor.
Gingrich said in yesterday’s Herald that he expects the race will come down to him and Romney. When asked last night if he could beat Romney in the Granite State, Gingrich said, “Who knows? By the way, I’d say to you that it’s more plausible tonight than it was yesterday.”
He also defended his ties to Freddie Mac and the health care industry that have come under scrutiny since his meteoric rise, explaining that those connections occurred before he was a presidential candidate.
The roller coaster-like GOP nomination process has twisted and turned for many of the seven candidates. U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and businessman Herman Cain all enjoyed surges in polls before crashing under media scrutiny.
Yesterday’s poll showed Gingrich and Romney in a statistical dead heat among likely GOP primary voters, Romney with 29 percent and the former House speaker with 27 percent.
The group’s last poll just a month ago showed Romney with 40 percent of the vote and Gingrich with only 6 percent.
Romney didn’t mention the new poll during a campaign event in Manchester yesterday, but in a subtle tweak to his rivals, he urged voters to choose the candidate they feel will win.
“Take a good look at them and decide who you think can win,” said Romney, who focused on the economy and jobs during his stump speech. “We’ve got to have somebody who can win.”
Gingrich Backs Patriot Act With Call to Boost Terrorism Defenses for U.S.
By Roxana Tiron - Nov 22, 2011 7:38 PM CT
Former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich, the Republican presidential front runner, said that the U.S. must strengthen tools to detect and prevent terrorism because “all of us will be in danger for the rest of our lives.”
Speaking at a national security debate in Washington, Gingrich said that he would extend the USA Patriot Act which provides U.S. law enforcement with extra powers.
“You want to use every tool you can possibly use to gather intelligence,” Gingrich said. “The dangers are literally that great.”
The eight Republican presidential hopefuls met for a second take this month on national security and foreign policy. The debate was hosted by CNN and two non-profit policy groups, the Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute.
Gingrich, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, Texas Governor Rick Perry, businessman Herman Cain, Minnesota Representative Michele Bachmann, Texas Representative Ron Paul, former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman and former Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania took the stage just blocks from the White House.
Paul immediately tangled with Gingrich, warning against giving up liberty. “You can prevent crimes by becoming a police state,” he said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Roxana Tiron in Washington at rtiron@bloomberg.net To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Silva at msilva34@bloomberg.net