Concerning your statement: Again, we would have to get off the otc for those things to come into play anyway and there are a number or requirements that we simply don't meet yet.
I completely agree. In fact if you check my posts you will find that I was the first person to bring that fact to the boards attention (ref. post 25438).
Points of note:
You stated "that applies ONLY to larger, better established companies..." this is not a true statement.
You know what lets not do this I asked where is the wisdom in this move (20 for 1 r/s)....would you agree that a greater split would have been more appropriate or do think that a 20 to 1 is the perfect number?