InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

king yukon

11/17/11 10:37 AM

#5413 RE: Ecomike #5410

Last year my post regarding real value per share based on a buyout by any company, whoever. The buyout put the PPs at roughly $200.oo per share. Then a whole ARMY of posters went ballistic and mocked the POST, of course I laughed it off in that they did not have the courage or hutspa to do the math. Could BHP be asking certain parties to hold off so to speak? Petrohawk may be whispering in their ears. Any how on a scale for the 500 billion cubic feet per section,yields 7 trillion cubic feet. That boiled down to the $200.oo figure based on a number of buyouts from like 2009-2010. It is a scary number and i did the math over and over to be certain that it was correct and so I could not buckle in the face of doubters. SADLY & REDICULESSLY, MNLU is going so slo,I now suspect that there is a buyer also that is going to pounce on MNLU on an exact given day. That any buyer would by virtue of the PROBABLE RESERVES would need to be a BIG outfit! ??????? CHESEPEAK class....... Hope Doc can get the right prescription for us all and cure the ailment.
icon url

admfsf

11/17/11 3:01 PM

#5415 RE: Ecomike #5410

I'm asking these questions because the answers are bogus pal.

Yes, I'm aware of the Petrohawk acquisition by BHP, which only completed in August 2011. Petrohawk could have made the investment prior. Where's BHP now? - Are they going to make an investment in this PIG? No.

Shale gas experts in NYC do not like this deal. It's that simple.

"Mike Parker" doesn't exist. He's not listed as the IR contact on MNLU's press releases, nor the website. I challenge anyone to prove he exists. The post asking Mike Newport if Parker exists seems fake and simply can't be verified. - Has anyone met Parker in person? His number doesn't match the numbers on the MNLU site...

Read the comments on this article: http://www.stockwatch.com/newsit/newsit_newsit.aspx?bid=Z-C:*SEC-1614128&symbol=*SEC&news_region=C

Is Brent Pierce involved in MNLU??? Seems so.