InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

David Fowler

11/11/11 9:57 AM

#176085 RE: Funaboard #176084

None of Katx properties are the Olympic Dam so it really doesn't matter.
icon url

74stingray

11/11/11 9:57 AM

#176086 RE: Funaboard #176084

lol, yes you are definitely wasting your time with KATX, about time you see the light.
Now run and tell Ken to smarten up and stop scamming.

___________________________________________________________________

Olympic Dam had sub economic copper on it hole #1 too
Olympic Dam had ......

Never mind I'm wasting my time !!!
icon url

alansnowcross2

11/11/11 10:03 AM

#176089 RE: Funaboard #176084

You have to combine the value per ton of ALL the minerals found.

When you add it up, combined with the facts that Kat properties are close to Roads, ports and power. In an environment that is friendly to mining- Sweet!
worth the wait, worth a try, small investment cost - high potential return.
Each makes their choice!
icon url

B402

11/11/11 10:30 AM

#176093 RE: Funaboard #176084

Subeconomic Copper LMAO HV

Katx found no grades or intersections,,,Barren Hole

Your Comparison does not work
And never has

OD found This..
From the OD Geo
http://www.science.org.au/scientists/interviews/w/notes_woodall.html

We drilled the fifth hole and we got a similar intersection to the first hole, a ‘sniff’. Well!

What was the length of the intersection?

Initially, 30 metres. That may have seemed a big intersection, but now you’re down 300 metres, it’s only 1% copper, and with copper only 50 cents a pound such an intersection is uneconomic.