Of course I did. What they say is always going to be suspect and what they end up with is the truth (if it's independently audited). The fact is, the .4g estimates are too high until they prove otherwise. Read the whole paragraph instead of just that one sentence you pointed out. Typical trader ploy to take things out of context. ;)
Management clearly were trying to establish investor confidence (and personal confidence?) by stating that they will achieve those results. The fact is, they don't know and IMO, they set their numbers too high. Hopefully they'll prove me wrong, but I doubt it. :)
I tell ya, they haven't put a PR for a reason, and that reason is likely to have a negative impact on pps.
\\//_
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
