Replies to post #49795 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[Cougar6]

I don't have to defend anyone, nor would I. I either agree with or disagree with actions and motives not personalities. You think I dislike Turrini but I do not like or dislike him. I have issues with his actions or inaction and, based on the facts as I can ascertain them, deduce probable motives. I do the same with Williams. It just so happens that, from what I can tell, William's actions and motives tend to align with my interests as a shareholder significantly more often then Turrini's actions and motives.

As for Storm the facts speak or themselves, or are you denying that Storm's x-partner is one of Diac's many attorneys. If that is not true then I will withdraw my deduction.

[downsideup]

"Storm worked for CLYW, not Daic. What a joke"

Exactly. That Storm worked for CLYW is a joke...

Storm "knew very well the lack of evidence CLYW had against Daic in the state case and he reported as such at the forum."

Which appears to me it is a criminal act knowingly undertaken in furtherance of a conspiracy. Even if not held to account for that criminal act, Storm should be disbarred not just for commenting on the case, but for doing the damage to "his client's case" that he did... and did deliberately... in an illegal meeting that seems it constituted an knowing effort to solicit an illegal proxy. Storm is in this thing up to his eyeballs. It is funny, isn't it, how you can arrange to manufacture a lack of evidence... when you make it a point to not bother looking for any... as particularly when you have first hand knowledge ?

Will be great fun seeing Storm deposed...

"And Daic was not going to sell the patent it was just legal games. "

Well, in reality, what you call "legal games" is yet another criminal act... "fraud, and conspiracy to commit fraud"... not least your own claim that they committed a singular fraud in knowingly filing false documents with the court ? Fraud practiced in court, fraud practiced through the courts, and fraud practiced ON the courts... is a repeat theme here... probably for a reason ? Sure is amazing how many corrupt lawyers Daic knows.

There is obviously not a dime's worth of difference or a sliver of daylight between Turrini and Peirce. They're clearly working very closely together. Probably spending too much time together in elevators. Both Turrini and Peirce are engaged, each with the other, in a pattern of corruption... you can't believe what either one of them say... literally joined at the hip... or, somewhere near the hip... just a question of who's on top.