Disclaimer in case something came up and we all know it. The very fact that they call for a engineer registered in the first state to be hired virtually immediately makes it abundantly clear with neon flashing flights and sirons screaming that they selected the first site eons ago -- the ability to change the due date is irrelevant. Lawyers always insert language like that. :)
is the only document that's been executed since the signing of the Master Agreement
And you know this how?
I'll answer it for you -- you don't. There is zero question that the first site has been selected -- that's just common sense. The PRs themselves even spoke about how JBII visited NYSE: RKT -- what were they doing there....sipping coffee at any random place?
Oh yeah... that other agreement in writing that doesn't exist that modifies the terms of the agreement?
You don't accept that the addendum(s) exist and therefore conclude there is no site being worked upon, yet in the next sentence you accept the existence of some change in the terms of the master agreement, for which there no evidence, as a reason that the 90 days clause for the site preparation drawings by a state licensed engineer aren't required to be done by now.
Seems odd that the same logic results in two different outcomes.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
