InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

space1230

11/03/11 12:57 PM

#17600 RE: iblong2 #17595

Oh amen to that! But they just keep nipping at the heals of new management for blaming old management for their incompetence.

At some point, Medlink needs to disclose the details of there dealing with Comedy Net and the details of the transfer of the shell to Premiere.
icon url

greedy__malone

11/03/11 2:52 PM

#17602 RE: iblong2 #17595

iblong it really speaks more of SCG than it does Medlink.

Why?

Because SCG boguht up all this stock knowing that a huge number of shares were out there somewhere, out of the company's control and yet, they still moved forward, still brought in Premiere, still brought in Ken's nephew to be a puppet CEO and yet, had nowhere near the info from Medlink to make thighs right.

That is stuff you get cleared up before you proceed not after you already have control. Don;t you think it is important, from a business standpoint that all these issues are cleared up before you decide to take over control?

Pink sheet shells are a dime a dozen and there are literally thousands of them out there that are clean that can be taken over with less work, expense and trouble. So, why get involved with ANWM when there are missing shares that have been gone for years among other problems that have delayed every proposed great event SCG was pumping?

Seems just plain unprofessional and as if very poop business decisions were made before requiring all the deficiencies to be cleared up. WHy invest so much on handshakes and promises and then pump away as if the problems do not exist?