Replies to post #132612 on Circa Pict. & Prod. Co. Intnl Inc. (fka CPPD)

[QBIDis4real]

Posted by: rhawkinss68
In reply to: skunksyard who wrote msg# 132521 Date:7/1/2005 12:49:49 PM
Post #of 132529


"For everyone thinking that because LOGO aired first means Q is dead should look at HBO (1975), Showtime (1978). Just because one is better than the other does not mean one is going to fail. In the beginning they both showed the same movies.

Just like there is room for multiple movie channels there is room for Logo, Here, and QBID. Being second best in the makret will still net investors a good gain."
_____________________________________________________________

* - Same goes for Shoe companies, Airline Companies, Food Companies, Music Companies.
It is all really positive. A hand in hand thing if you ask me.

QBIDis4real

[skunksyard]

I disagree...I think QTN will compete successfully if they continue with their 'known' folks hiring. QTN has a lot of personality. The folks are not only knowledgeable but fun and they can lean on the edge a bit more than LOGO I bet. Time will tell on all 3 but obviously I watched LOGO for 10 minutes last night, that clearly at least tells me it doesn't make a difference what LOGO does. My money is on QTN (QBID) and that's the station I'm watching closely. It's like when they launched Nancy Grace, it didn't put Larry King out of business....it simply added another opportunity to watch a talk show host....but what makes more sense to me is to watch how the network you have your money on does. That's why I said if the LOGO folks found LOGO to be superb to QTN they ought to be running to invest in Viacom and not QBID. For me it's QBID and QBID only.

[junkmasterg]

agreed...

i would draw a comparision more like the sundance channel to HBO though

high quality on sundance, but it can never catch the full market share of a juggernaut like HBO

but enough to make everyone happy