InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

exlud

10/30/11 10:28 AM

#1608 RE: Gixene #1606

I'd suggest looking at this board for technical analysis:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=7882
You should also do some serious research on fundamental analysis, how to read a balance sheet, and understanding SEC filings. Not surprisingly, I don't see much of that on Ihub.
Without having a good understanding of ALL of these things, you're basically a redshirt trying to play in the NFL without pads or a helmet. You're going to get crushed.
icon url

nsomniyak

10/30/11 11:55 AM

#1609 RE: Gixene #1606

They are talking out of their ass. "Value" comes from the balance sheet and income statement--what do they own, what do they owe, are they generating more cash than they are paying out?

Broadly speaking, a beta of 1.3 means the individual stock would move 1.3 times as much as the general market. It will take bigger swings up and down.
icon url

stervc

11/01/11 7:52 AM

#1615 RE: Gixene #1606

JGulley317, to answer this question...

According to IHub rules, everyone posting here within the ESPI forum or any of the IHub forums are to be considered talking out the side of our asses as you have called it.

I call it nothing more than all of us respectfully sharing our opinions and thoughts to support why we believe or not believe in a stock as we do. When you don't have certain facts, you have no choice except to speculate to have some kind of a basis for you to form your opinion for where a stock will trade in the future. These forums are to share thoughts constructively about the company; good and/or bad.

I can project that ESPI will make over $100 million next year based on my beliefs, but it won't become a reality until they do. Me doing so is not enough to make them do so. It's up to the company to make me be correct and not lip service from me posting my beliefs. The same with lip service from those saying that they won't make such amount next year.

Just by the way of the market, the odds are not in favor of me being right. The odds for success is against us all within the market. This is why it's no ego thing about me being right or wrong with any kind of projections. It's the nature of the market that most of the time any positive projections will be wrong. Most companies fail than succeed for the arena that we are in.

It needs to be understood that all of us here within these IHub forums only share "food for thought" to read and consider as a possibility for being correct. It should not be taken as fact until after the fact of something actually being achieved. My next post should help you to understand these thoughts further, especially here with ESPI.

v/r
Sterling