InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

I_banker

06/29/05 6:45 PM

#58391 RE: Tenchu #58390

So Tenchu, what is that you are saying? Intel is or is not a monopolist? They will or will not prevail at trial? Damages will or will not be significant (significant being >$1 billion).
icon url

fastpathguru

06/29/05 7:04 PM

#58394 RE: Tenchu #58390

Is that the best you can come up with? Fatigue is not a valid legal defense.

"Your honor, we move to dismiss, for the reason that everybody has heard this all before."

fpg
icon url

bobs10

06/29/05 7:23 PM

#58398 RE: Tenchu #58390

Bobs, same old allegations. Marketing over engineering, strongarming over competing, destructive practices over constructive ones, leadership getting desperate, supporters in denial.

You've been following this industry for 20+ years. Try coming up with something new. Even a young guy like me with only eight years of experience can recognize the same old same old.

Tenchu

Me...

Well it takes some people longer than others to see the obvious, If you get my drift.

Actually, I think I've got a lock on this management thing, no one else seems to see how pathetic INTC management is. When I'm thinking of making an investment in a company, one of the first things I look at is management. One of the reasons I got out of INTC in 1998 was that Barrett was taking over and since then the boy has continued to underwhelm.

Give it another 20 years and you will probably get the hang of this stock investing thing. Some things just reek, a good nose is a priority.