InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lazyazzdaddy

10/15/11 2:47 PM

#20753 RE: liable #20752

"The original question was whether or not DUSS owned the show. They don't."

My question, do you have something to back this up, or as I have already mentioned, is this just your speculation?

If you have something to prove your statement please share as that was the whole reasoning behind my posts today.
I have not mentioned whether or not I believe that Dussault apparel inc owns or profits from Dussault inc. I DO NOT BELIEVE THEY DO! but also, as mentioned, I'm looking for proof , one way or the other!.
icon url

Nethescurial

10/15/11 2:55 PM

#20754 RE: liable #20752

It never did matter. It wasn't my question, and it's completely irrelevant. The equation is simple: more exposure for the show = more exposure for the company = more revenue for the company = higher stock price. This simple formula has been proven countless times throughout history. Why do you think corporations spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to get product placements for a couple of seconds in movies and TV shows? Maybe because it works?