InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lazyazzdaddy

10/15/11 12:56 PM

#20732 RE: liable #20731

your argument is sound but I have still seen no direct proof! my reasoning is that if you read their filings from early 2010 will will see note of Dussault inc in their filings as the main source of advertisement. but they did not state whether or not Dussault inc is part of Dussault apparel.

The closest thing I have seen myself making any mention of this direct link is "Dussault apparel inc. announces Dussault inc television show" but again this could just be promotion of show....... I'm only looking for solid conformation only, one way or the other....

Liable, I am not trying to call you out, I am just looking to squash this argument one way or the other, by comparing my DD with that of others..

icon url

Nethescurial

10/15/11 2:33 PM

#20747 RE: liable #20731

Liable, IT DOESN'T MATTER if there is or isn't a direct financial relationship between Dussault Apparel and the Dussault Inc. reality show. The entire point is that the show will bring MASSIVE attention and exposure to the Dussault Apparel clothing line, which in turn will have a positive effect on both the company's revenues and the DUSS stock. You seem to be in denial of this indisputable fact. Do you really expect anyone to believe that this kind of exposure won't have any effect on the company and stock?