The problem comes from what if the shares I hold in my brokerage account are longs from another naked shorts on the other side. So it there are more longs than the AS. After the recent DC and vote the company should have a pretty good idea of the short position if 1.4 billion votes where cast?
Considering Scott's intention to make Shining Tree spin-out NI 43-101, yes a forced cover would ensue. In my previous post I was basically considering only SRSR shareholders, not the MMs themselves who would be putting "electronic counterfeit" borrowed shares into shareholders accounts. No problem for the MMs if the spin-out has little or no value. However, You correctly assessed that it appears Scott is moving rapidly to avoid this scenario by making Shining Tree a reporting NI 43-101 company a priority. The underlying value of Shining Tree would make it highly unprofitable for any MMs to maintain "borrowed" shares created for the spin-out, which would also be short until reconciled and covered.
I'm beginning to like Scott's plan more and more each day! Easy