I do NOT agree that Brown and Harrs haven't sold any new EXPH shares in the past nine months. They could have done so illegally. Just as you have absolutely zero evidence that they haven't, including the preponderance of circumstantial evidence solidly braced against your position pointing to the fact that IF there was any way for them to raise cash doing so, illegally or legally, they would have in a heartbeat. Once again common sense comes into play. Why would Brown and Harrs take time out from their busy days robbing their banker, their raw materials supplier and the IRS to print more dilutionary shares if the IRS was going to seize the money anyway? Or the SEC had issued them a cease and desist? There wouldn't be public knowledge of either of those situations but they could well be in place meaning that COMMON SENSE would indicate issuing more EXPH shares after February 2011 when they likely would have been imposed would then be POINTLESS. There is no way to impart to any entity the common sense necessary to discern that simple fact so as to end the endless, unproven, falsely stated claims that it is FACTUAL that Brown and Harrs haven't issued any more dilutive EXPH shares. Just like there is no need to prevaricate and to post misleading, out of context statements misquoting and purposefully misleading others as to what a forum member believes is the truth. It's just that common sense would have to be present in any entity pursuing this cause endlessly to prevent it from taking place. IMHO.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
