InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Crazy Money

10/09/11 10:30 PM

#109469 RE: easymillion #109467

Time will tell if a NSS has been built up here over the years by MMs, IMO. Easy

There are no shortzzz that need to cover in any meaningful way... EASY

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SRSR/short-sales

icon url

iamadog

10/10/11 12:20 AM

#109473 RE: easymillion #109467

they were first caught off guard on the run to the 20s they stalled it back then this time they will not be as lucky just my opinion. Eventually shorter now than later. They had their fun now its our turn
icon url

HARD ASSets

10/10/11 9:50 AM

#109474 RE: easymillion #109467

Do you think this vote can act as an effective share count, or will we have to wait for a short squeeze to know?
icon url

downsideup

10/10/11 10:09 PM

#109502 RE: easymillion #109467

"Time will tell if a NSS has been built up here over the years by MMs, IMO."

While that is probably true (that "time will tell"), the solid fact implied in yours (that we can't tell now) IS clearly true... and that fact provides a proof that there is a large problem that exists in our markets.

The markets should be transparent enough to enable knowing what the REAL balance between demand and supply of shares is, at any point in time... in real time. The only reason there can be for obstructing awareness of that reality in the true balance between demand and supply... in any time frame... is a desire to enable the practice of fraud based on that lack of market transparency.

That is particularly true now, when technology makes that easy, and enables us to participate in real time auctions, live, 24 hours a day. REAL auctions, without a need for any "market making" intermediaries manipulating prices, and whose function only works to obstruct our view of the real balance between supply and demand, interfering with proper price discovery.

If the markets we have now cannot enable that sort of transparency, we should create new ones that can.

If the only reason MMs wanted to allow short sales was to "facilitate proper market making"... then there would be no reason to have an interest in enabling any lack of transparency, as the market making function would be transparent, too, ensuring that the market price always properly reflected real supply and demand.

Instead of full transparency, giving all market participants full awareness of the real balance between real supply and demand in the market as public common, what you have now gives us absolutely no way of telling what the real situation in supply and demand is.

Maybe, as you say, time will tell... but, there is no reason anyone should ever have to wait to know what the balance between REAL supply and market demand for shares (or anything else, like ounces of silver... ) actually is.