I have the answer to this ongoing problem about Expo and "denigration". The word "denigrate" has simply been confused by certain entities in a lockstep mindset of denial with "telling the truth". When a company has been clearly defined by the superior intellect of other certain entities for two years as a disaster waiting to happen because it was obvious the management personnel were crooks, that isn't "denigration". It's defined in the case of Expo Holdings, Inc. as "superior insight resultant of superior research and knowledge". Ignoring said research and superior insight of those other entities better schooled in the ways of the pink sheet and OTC can lead to large losses such as those suffered by certain entites invested in EXPH shares. It can also be the result of arrogance and hubris blinding certain entities to their own numerous weaknesses. Many of which caused them to rely on their own flawed and skewed perspectives to continue to invest and hold EXPH shares even after it has become blatantly obvious the company was a scam and the management were thieves. To paraphrase Clint Eastwood, "certain entities have to know their own limitations...". This holds true for investing in Expo Holdings, Inc. as well as in the correct utilization of investment grammar and vocabulary where Expo Holdings is concerned. Hope this helps clear things up. IMHO.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
