Replies to post #101195 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[bia33nca]

so why was this volume surge (no real money but at least a volume surge) not surprising? By your own data it goes against the 10-day AND 90-day averages. so why was this not surprising? By vastly exceeding the 90-day average it makes this an anomaly.

40 million shares at $0.0002 equates to........$8,000. OMG big investors stepping up to the plate.

[Stock_Barber]

and clearly taking longer than *expected*

I agree! I expected the high volume dumpage to coincide with the discovery of the Federal tax liens... or the lawsuit by their main supplier... or the lawsuit from their bank... or the lack of paid state taxes...

Maybe it just took someone that long to find a broker that would actually take their desk drawer certs so they could sell?

[99leadballoons]

b4 friday's *volume* hit the tape

the avgs for exph were showing:

10-Day Average Volume 7,669,889
90-Day Average Volume 9,004,351


Was the sky blue?

The averages hovered right around those averages for like 7 straight trading days. What exactly is the point you are trying to make?

People are not fooled by made up correlations. That is all the above correlation is. There is no predictability at all. If there were you would have been able to post your prediction beforehand, not after the fact.

I will update later on what my volume prediction for today is. I bet I will guess right like I have done so many times before. It is amazing how I nail it every time, after the fact of course.

[Santa Barbara Broker]

I am just curious...Your take on Expo Holdings, Inc. at face value appears to be that it is to be expected in the normal course of business that the acting President and Secretary of a publicly held corporation will from time to time steal 941 and 940 employee tax witholdings from the US Treasury Department and divert the money for their own private use. That they will under normal circumstances be under the gun from lawsuits brought by failure to pay their contractual obligations from their main bank and their main supplier. That they will lend themselves $400K in "shareholder advances" (representing at the time of the loans from D&D and from Expo and at present far more than the net value of the entire company and all it's subsidiaries combined) from the shareholder's equity leaving absolutely no collateral of any kind in it's place. That they would strip clean the corporation of any and all appreciating real property assets, pocket the net proceeds and put in it's place an annual liability of $220K in lease payments. That they would file no Form 3s or Form 4s yet claim, at what would appear to have been the very brink of personal bankruptcy that they had never sold a single one of their common shares. That they would stop filing any type of financials due most likely to their inability to do so because of the inability to reconcile the numbers to account for 18 months of ongoing felony level tax evasion. You accept all of this as normal and completely acceptable behavior based solely not on law but because of the exchange where the company is listed, one must "come to expect criminal behavior" as the norm. But despite all that alleged criminal behavior and unscrupulous lack of fiduciary duty to shareholders, you believe the only single anomaly related in any way to the PPS decline in EXPH shares is manipulation by unknown, unseen "agents" working with unscrupulous MMs? That is the reasoning behind the share sale reports? That the principals of the company are totally and completely innocent of any wrong doing whatsoever regardless of the ton of unbiased, vetted evidence available to the contrary on government websites. And to make that point that purpose behind the EXPH share decline is easily explained as the result of something for which there is and has never been any proven evidence whatsoever, based on unvetted, unproven speculation and hearsay? That is the purpose behind the constant EXPH trading data publication? IMHO.