Replies to post #26023 on Colorado Goldfields Inc. (fka CGFI)

[RKYMNT4]

MT, From the information I could glean about dry stacking, there doesn't seem to be much in the way of construction. There are no retaining walls or buildings associated with it. The only "construction", as I see it, would be grading the site level. Perhaps there are some anomalies at our site that have to be addressed, but I don't anticipate any thing major. Also, we are about a month behind on our time table, thats pretty much standard. I wish all my projects came in on time. I would start to worry if nothing has happened in two or three months time. Remember there's the clients time table (why isn't DONE!), the contractors time table (it'll be done in a month, maybe) and reality, which somewhere inbetween. LOL JMO--GO CGFIA

[Civicbird]

It seems like too much of an undertaking for CGFIA beyond the mill permit approval.(Which I hope is any day now......this week maybe?) But I certainly hope a substantial buyout, in the price per earnings ratio range that 567 provided, is imminent.(Hopefully this year) Were the assay and asset results of each mine ever released, or is Guyer crunching the numbers in the meantime? Guyer has moved on from others ventures before, so I hope this is a very viable option for longs.(With what's in the mines, I can't imagine any of the industry leaders passing this up)

[Shredder015]

M T, Thanks for the info.