Replies to post #101865 on RCC Holdings Corp fka RCCH

[EarnestDD]

Time is NOT on RCCH's side ... Newton, left to his own devices, is an SEC nightmare for shareholders.
Case in point ... Gendarme.
jmo

[Wyatt Earp]

Mcokpba/RE: Comments

Your comments are very eloquent. I appreciate your candor. Please understand I do not, nor have not be privledged to any insider information to base my comments on, only past experience and yes, I do rely on the actions of QBID to base some of my outlook on. BIFS is another one that pretty much holds true to my statements about Rocketing up, retrace, up more, retrace, upward and then finally fall like a rock. I guess that is the way MM's shake the weak hearted out of their shares.

I too will remain here and patient. My comfort zone may be way under most. I have a seling point at .02 for some shares. I also have a GTC for $2 on others. My goal, quite simply is to become debt free. A lofty goal, but somehow I believe Mr Newton will make it a relality!!

Good luck to all.

Wyatt

[S-BEES-BUMBLEBEE]

Could it be the case that RCC Holdings Corp. is also the owner of RCC Solar Inc.???

RCC Solar won the Sunpower Intelligent design award in 2009!

http://www.rccsolar.com/index-2.html
http://www.rccsolar.com/index-1.html
http://www.rccsolar.com/index-4.html

RCC Solar Inc. as a sole subsidiary of RCCH would be a great thing IMO!!!

..anyone knows a bit more???

[frogdreaming]

I'm afraid I can't follow your logic.

That is an amazing prediction based on a more bizarre ‘I have inside information’ statement (“a price has already been decided upon concerning the top figure”). I and everyone who follows this RCCH message board would really like to hear what information you have received in the last 6 days to motivate you to confidently post a ‘I can predict the future because I have inside’ statement like that.

Clearly you suspect that there is insider information being disseminated. Either intentionally or accidentally, but insider information nevertheless. (The latest info regarding the Tampa conference is also somewhat compelling.)

Given those suspicions it seems completely counter-intuitive that you would then go on to suggest:

Take everything you read on a message board with a huge tablespoon of salt. "XXXXXX" is just stating his opinion.

The 'tablespoon of salt' advice is a 'given' but to dismiss the warning as just an 'opinion' seems a little 'head in the sand' under the circumstances.

When an obvious cheerleader with more inside information than should normally be available suddenly makes a hundred and eighty degree turn in outlook, it bodes well to pay attention. Regardless of the denials, the evidence is compelling and the previous activity builds a fairly specific profile, to suddenly abandon that viewpoint and start to play CYA obviously indicates a significant event is imminent. An event not to be enjoyed.