I agree. If they state in the DC that Dahlman Rose will be handling the IPO. I vote 100% in favor of the deal. But you are assuming that Dahlman Rose is involved in this aspect of the deal. Again. This is an assumption you have made personally, and done so with no facts that this assumption is reasonable.
This should be disclosed. We have no ability to assosciate this DC as Dahlman Rose's influence.
Hold on there. No one can say that Dahlman rose was involved in this decision. To use that as the basis is misguided. DR's involvement has been hidden intentionally. There involvement could be as little as filing a paper, we don't know. This is the root of the problem no one knows much for sure. I kinda like the slant of the conversation here. We all should vote with eyes wide open. I don't feel confident to vote yes on this with the information I currently have.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
