InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

underdog150

09/22/11 8:37 PM

#101053 RE: venomen2002 #101052

You forgot something veno, no shareholder meeting .
Why did they cancel the most important part of their annual P&D one week before it was scheduled?
------------------
Today is the last day of Summer..No new dilution of shares in late May and and early June. No new dilution of shares in July which was switched to Summer and now..no new dilution of shares in Summer..In fact no new AS increases for over seven months..Case closed..The rest is fodder...veno
icon url

Santa Barbara Broker

09/22/11 9:22 PM

#101056 RE: venomen2002 #101052

A question about Expo Holdings.

Your continued, repeated plea:

No new dilution of shares in July which was switched to Summer and now..no new dilution of shares in Summer


If a person has never had a car accident because they have never owned or driven a car, is it logical to say they're a "safe driver"?

If Expo Holdings, Inc. is prohibited from selling shares by the SEC OR the IRS has made it well known to them they would seize any and all proceeds from any share sales, is it still logical to say they "haven't diluted" because that one method of dilution is not an option any longer in existence?

Continuing to tout a company that is in complete ruin and implying that EXPH shares are a terrific and safe investment over and over and over again on the strength of the company not doing something they simply can't do, is not logical. They haven't been able to sell shares most likely since since they were declared DTC ineligible earlier this year. They most certainly WOULDN'T sell shares if they knew the SEC had told them they couldn't register them or if they knew the IRS would seize any capital they raised anyway.

So why...why this continued implied plea for people to buy as many EXPH shares as they can and to invest in this broke disaster of a dysfunctional, worthless company? IMHO.
icon url

EarnestDD

09/22/11 9:59 PM

#101058 RE: venomen2002 #101052

BUT ... HUGE IRS Tax Liens. I think shareholders would be better off with the DILUTION.
lmao
jmo
icon url

AStTropaz

09/23/11 1:54 AM

#101059 RE: venomen2002 #101052

Well Veno, I will answer your quotes below AGAIN:

In fact no new AS increases for over seven months..Case closed..The rest is fodder...veno

Share dilution of EXPH alone has been over 2.3 Billion shares since last year. That's a FACT! Now let's look at some of the *fodder* we've come to realize over the summer. Hmmmmm, taking employee credited funds fodder, 6 figure federal tax liens / IRS fodder, Southern Community Bank - lendor lawsuit fodder, Wurth Wood - supplier lawsuit fodder, cancelled shareholder meeting fodder and the list goes on and on and on. Yep, like the past tense of that song [now - SUMmmmmertime and the living was easy], EXPO exposing themselves was pretty predictable. Since today we've entered Fall, I'll see if I can come up with a good closing EXPO medley?! LOL
icon url

mahatmapaul

09/23/11 1:13 PM

#101069 RE: venomen2002 #101052

In fact no new AS increases for over seven months..Case closed..The rest is fodder...veno



LMAO!!

veno: FOCUS!

what will it take -- since apparently you do not give credence to anything SBB or anyone else here posts -- for you to understand that an IRS tax lien for not remitting payroll deductions is extremely serious, often resulting in several-year prison sentences?

what will it take for you to see -- beyond the felonious nature of the action -- that exph was in dire financial straits, otherwise it would not have had to steal this money?

what will it take for you to see the seriousness in exph's main supplier suing for non-payment? You have repeated ad nauseam the increasing sales, improving forecasts, etc. etc., all which of have clearly been debunked by JD's own actions in thieving the payroll and in thieving his main supplier. Legitimate companies with backlogs of orders, good sales forecasts, and ethical management DO NOT STIFF THEIR SUPPLIERS.

what will it take for you to see the seriousness in the bank that you claimed vetted exph suing exph for non-payment? This publicly documented and available development by itself (without assistance from the IRS or the supplier) absolutely, unconditionally wrecks exph's credit standing and has destroyed their ability to borrow money. fodder?

what source -- if there is one -- is and has been convincing you that the business is doing well, everyone is busy, JD and "Shirley" are busy on the road selling, etc., etc?? Is it JD? Wishful thinking perhaps? If there is a source, you should divorce yourself from it.

what will it take for you to see the seriousness in exph not answering any e-mails? Your previous "malicious intent" answer was so outside the bounds of good business sense, that I simply don't know how to respond

When will you admit that you have been simply wrong on all these issues?

Your definition of "fodder" is bizarre and does not correspond to its general usage.

(all imho)

p.s. I'm lmao watching the enablers go down in flames. FLAME ON!