InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

KeithDust2000

06/20/05 5:06 PM

#57729 RE: I_banker #57726

I_banker, it´s just a snapshot of the lowest available pricing, I´m personally most interested in that for the reasons I´ve cited before. There are also S939/754 parts, Newcastle, Winchester, Venice etc., but Pricewatch is there for everyone to use and come
up with other comparisons!

What you suggested certainly also makes sense, from another angle, you can also look at Mike´s Reseller pricing etc. Lots of possibilities.


icon url

chipdesigner

06/20/05 5:09 PM

#57730 RE: I_banker #57726

Ahh, I should've known Keith would pull something like that. Thanks for pointing it out.


icon url

eracer

06/20/05 5:43 PM

#57731 RE: I_banker #57726

Keith, wouldn't it be more informative to compare the latest Intel version to the latest AMD version of a given chip (i.e. Rev E for AMD). If you do this, the premiums shrink quite a bit.

As an AMD investor, I look forward to the day that AMD product is priced comparably to Intel product, relying on the merits of a given processor to sell, rather than price.



Why would that be more informative? Supply of rev. E parts appears to be constrained. AMD investors would be happier if the rev. E premiums actually went to AMD rather than the lucky few rev. E vendors who are inflating the prices and pocketing the premiums themselves.