The concept you appear to be having difficulty with is that your comparison was totally irrelevant and inappropriate because the REASON that the worst product in your example succeeded was because of something (economic inertia: an inbuilt high cost of switching to newer technology) that is completely inapplicable in KBLB's case.
Your example was of no relevance whatsoever to KBLB for that specific reason.
In order to be relevant an example must not be dependent on a feature or principle that is not present in what it's applied to.
If I say that gas powered automobiles are good in areas with limited gasoline distributing facilities and that therefor your car is not a good idea for such an area, if your car is solar powered my example does not apply. Get it?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
