Again, you have missed the point entirely.
I was very clear that the market would be divided into varying qualities and that the higher qualities would be much higher priced for the high tech fiber markets.
I made the comment about Lambourginis precisely to emphasize that while some individuals might use garments made of the higher qualities intended for high tech fibers, they would be very few in number and would have to pay a very high price for the privilege (very few people own Lambourginis and they pay a very high price for doing so, get it?) The intended market is for those qualities was clearly indicated as the high tech fibers market. The individuals using garments made of those high quality fibers were clearly indicated as exceptions. I in no way whatsoever suggested that they were the "target market" as you are apparently intending to imply.
The "target market" (for the high quality fibers) is the high tech fibers market. The use of that quality of fiber for clothing is the equivalent of what in medicine would be called an "off-label" use. Get it?
Again, I neither said nor implied in any way whatsoever that garments were a "target market" for the high quality end of the fibers.
I've seen a Hummer that was cut in two and lengthened to make a "stretch" Hummer in the same fashion as "stretch" limousines are made (talk about an oxymoron!) The fact that some (Very few) people do that with Hummers in no way implies that that was an intended market for Hummers and I VERY much doubt that the people who make Hummers take such uses into any account when making their projections!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
