InvestorsHub Logo

Slojab

09/01/11 12:23 PM

#12517 RE: Z62 #12516

No where has it said anything like that at all

Exactly. lol

It's the LACK of anything being said that brought up the question!

What then, is your explanation for it being omitted from the last Q? Oversight? Unnecessary? What?

lmcat

09/01/11 2:44 PM

#12525 RE: Z62 #12516

Please explain the omissions that NODUMMY pointed out!

If you look at the most recent 10Q filing the word Helios shows up in the filing exactly 0 (zero) times.

In the previous 10Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, the $500,000 initial payment to Helios (issued in stock) was listed as an asset under (equipment Helios).

In the most recent 10Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, that $500,000 was no longer showing as an asset.

The FACT that Helios was removed as an asset is significant or did TMSH file a false 10Q? Can't have it both ways!