In one post, you say you were there among the 'poker faces'. In the very next post, you say 'we are suppose to take your word now in a your little magic backroom meeting'.
In one post you claim to have been there, and in the next you refer to the event solely from the viewpoint of someone else. It doesn't jibe.
This is important because your posts may affect another's view of the stock. Were you there, or not?