Replies to post #100836 on RCC Holdings Corp fka RCCH

[ThSeeker]

Mcokpba. Although we do not agree on conclusions or speculation that was a good effort. Thanks.

[N.A.T.]

Good post. My original investment was also at $0.02. My average is lower than yours - 0.00023. I have sold half of my 47 million shares, and am holding the rest. I don't have confidence about it, but I won't dump any more at a loss. Good luck to us all.

[op9171787]

CEO Gene Newton is waiting for the legal timing to be right before releasing the financials.

i dont believe newton is that savvy. he's been hiding.

[EarnestDD]

No excuse for Newton not updating shareholders, having IR, having a phone that works, having an office even.
No excuse for not filing financials as promised six months ago.
No excuse for selling billions of shares to Gendarme at a Deep Discount.
jmo

CEO Gene Newton is waiting for the legal timing to be right before releasing the financials.

[frogdreaming]

That was a very nice try at sounding reasonable but it lacked any foundation for what you tried to build.

While you cited certain published statements in each case your interpretations were based on nothing but your own internal belief structure and were completely unsupported by facts.

I believe ... RCCH will be an exception to the general rule and will get clearance from DTCC to trade again.

Based on what facts? What differences between RCCH and the 'general rule' do you see that support your belief in the exception?

This situation is causing as much consternation to the naked short sellers as it does to me as a retail investor.

Outside of your belief in the existence of naked short sellers associated with RCCH, what facts support such a belief?

(Please don't spin some wording in the DTC memorandum into support since there is no mention of naked shorting in the memorandum and the DTC keeps and publishes a listing of all fails to deliver that would clearly indicate any DTC supported short position.)

In my opinion, CEO Gene Newton is waiting for the legal timing to be right before releasing the financials. I believe he is protecting my investment and I am willing to wait for all the legal events to occur to see how this all plays out.

In what universe does the suppression of financials 'protect' an investment? Surely the release of positive financial information would not only benefit the stock price directly but would indirectly force the cover of that imaginary short position that your belief structure depends upon.

I believe Gendarme” sold” more shares than they “acquired” from the issuer.

That is a completely unsupported and unsupportable premise that directly conflicts with the wording and limitations of the SEC complaint. If such an occurrence existed the punitive relief sought by the prosecutors would include rectification of that occurrence. It is not included and is therefore not available. So regardless of the strength of your 'belief', it is not going to happen.

I always appreciate the reasonable presentation of your postings, it is unfortunate that your conclusions and opinions do not stand up to even the mildest scrutiny.

[centflaparrothead]

usally i try to use the whole quote from another. like this one that you didnt use....

Realize that anyone who has made their buying decisions based on the word of the negative voices has not lost a single cent, yet those who bought based on the word of the promoters have lost everything.