Replies to post #22873 on Colorado Goldfields Inc. (fka CGFI)

[mayhem1]

Tks for the inf. Looks like this is going to be a long and drawn out procedure fr start to finish.Glad you enjoyed yourself.gl

[ruke]

Didn't you took some pictures with a digital camera so we can all join what is going on there?

[Ronix805]

I wonder,..
What DRMS's view of CGFIA is? I mean ultimately, CGFIA could do everything correct, but if there are powers to be that don't want that Company up and running,.. then i doubt it ever will be.
On the other hand, if DRMS is fully supportive of CGFIA,.. then skies the limits as long as CGFIA dots their "i's" and crosses their "t's".
Thats my take on life pretty much. There's always someone with more power behind the curtains, that pulls the strings.
Just curious if you get a good vibe about all of this Ficose? Do the big shots at CGFIA seem to give the vibe that this is heading in the right direction. Or do they give the vibe that rough waters possibly lay ahead?
Know what i mean.
I doubt that the head guys at CGFIA, don't have some kind of inside track as to whether some big shots else where support them or don't.

Ronix

[thomasg]

Great post thank you for the update of the mill.

[bigone]

ficose, Thanks so much for your update. We really, really appreciate your efforts and including us in your observations and opinions. Sincerely, Thanks again.

[mou10mn]

Thanks for the report. much appreciated. reading between the lines it sounds like they may not hit the timeline for permit approval and accepting stuff from other mines for processing.But it does sound like plenty of work is going on up there towards that end.

Thanks again

[California-Investor]

Thank you for your analysis of the whole situation. Sounds like we are on track but caught in the waiting game. Probably see something on the DRMS within the next couple weeks.

[Huntewr7]

ficose, Thanks very much for the good report.