InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Stock_Stalker

08/27/11 10:10 AM

#130192 RE: antiochdavidson #130191

Now, AD, I can get behind most of this post, your also more focused this time.

I actually agree with most of this post with the exception of INIX Rev's.

Why I cannot believe that they had rev's, or more specifically what they reported, um, did they not try to pull a fast one with the NFA and the 60K?.

If your willing to manipulate paperwork in one thing, would you or could you not assume that this is not the ONLY manipulation that they have done?.

Certainly easier to con investors then NFA.

Now, is it Ben or Doug or BOTH, working this scam?.

Regardless of either or both, they stung me and I hope there is more to uncover that will put these SOB's in jail at best, at minimum, have watchful eyes on these bastards.

All these Stinky Pinkies get is a slap on the wrist and they rinse and repeat. NO ONE looks out for the little guy and the chance of recovering anything, what does Ben and Doug have to auction off?.

Bernie M has a few things...
icon url

BobF

08/27/11 11:35 AM

#130193 RE: antiochdavidson #130191

Guys, your right, company sucks, no doubt...

BUT..............


Revenues still had come in, they did something right. Nothing justifies the trading action I have seen for this past year. The recent news that just came out, ok, so, that does not explain the trading style the past year.



Why would you believe revenue numbers are any more real than other numbers Ben/INIX falsified?

Lack of confidence explains the trading you see. Have you heard of Elliott Wave Theory?