Susie....You do your best thinking and posting in the middle of the night! As to Stan, The problem I have is that he is an advocate for silencing and ignoring a particular group. It's not that I consider myself more or less of a basher than others, the point is that within the bashing has been a great deal of truth, and to recommend that a group, any group be totally ignored for speaking their minds is equivalent to what Joe McCarthy attempted to do in the 50's, and Hitler in the 30's. Stan should know better. As to why Vince would have All Pro in his brothers name....I like your first guess that Vince may be told by the SEC that he cannot be involved with a public company so he put his brothers name on it. But, I don't believe that's it. More than likely, he wants to make All Pro a company that no one can put a claim on for recovery from Vince. The shareholders sue for their rights to All Pro....how can Vince give it to them, he doesn't even own it!!! The same reason why much of Vince's assets are in his wife's name. I believe your buddy Steinbrenner did the same thing with his racetracks. Ask Huck, if he can find the report from years 2001 and 2002, I would love to see if this was just recently changed!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
