InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bcblbrbm

06/10/05 8:29 AM

#24288 RE: Joe R #24287

Thanks for your take on the PJ reply to M's query. Not long winded at all. Yes, I stayed on, and have taken much more of a beating. Our investment group moved on (I am still a member). Funny, they seem more interested in SCMI now that they are out. So far, I am getting a lotta sass from them, but am hoping to see that change when Peter gets us off the Pinks. I really stayed on because I see enormous potential for this endeavour. I only hope that management allows the retail shareholders to share fully in the successes. The key to trust in this, is getting off the Pinks. If Peter does not do this, I see the possibility of management looting the coffers and leaving us spinning in the wind. If he does take us to an exchange, the accompanying oversight will ensure that potential looting will be discouraged. I need to see this company legitimized thru acceptance by an exchange. sam
icon url

kenco

06/10/05 9:14 AM

#24292 RE: Joe R #24287

Joe, I have never never never said that "Peter and the company are crooks who are trying to screw all investors out of money.", I have however stated that I dont think they are doing a very good job of management, and I have expressed my opinion that they have done some very questionable things which have hurt the company and thus the value of the stock, afterall, isnt that exactly what these boards are for, to openly discuss our concerns and DD on the company and its operations.

As for Peters communication with an investor, there is nothing in the world, law or otherwise, that prevents any investor from sharing the contents of that communication with other investors, once it is out it is legally public information, and it can be shared even if it is cut and pasted, and regardless of any threats or warnings that Peter puts at the end of the communication, the absolute only way that Peter could prevent that info from being shared would be if the company had the person receiving the info sign a non-disclose contract, which as I said, would raise a few eyebrows at the SEC as it well should of all investors.