Everything that was done ilegally was done by the former CEO. What specifically did the company (as an entity) do that was fraudulent (leading to believe that Roth and all others were involved)?
I have read the court case, I cannot see anything that indicates wrong doing by the business itself. It even points out that the former CEO told the others involved that he needed a reciept that would get anyone in SFIO who questioned him off his back.
I take that as he was duping everyone else in the organization.
The CEO did something ilegal, the company fired the CEO and now we just need the company absolved from this case.
If the company itself has done wrong, they have to charge the company of wrong doing.
The government is calling the actions taken during the FBI sting as fraud, the question is, who commited the fraud? Again, I've read the court case (not sure you have...) and it appears that TS and Fuentes were the only ones involved. If you have evidence pointing to the rest of the company, we would love to see it....