Replies to post #28313 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[richclaire2020]

no it is very credible unfortunately it is very sluggish and the ceo is a procrastinater

[motherland]

no

[igotthemojo]

you seem to be hanging your hat on these issues...its certainly nice that kblb has these relationships...but im not sure what those relationships exactly are...im not sure they are what you think they are...or that they mean these universities are whole heartedly endorsing kblb...

you seem to think that this supposed credibility is huge....about as huge as all the wonderful guys on the advisory board...if that is true, why can i buy kblb for a dime a share?...why cant they get money from somewhere other than a bottom feeding bs financial company...

so far all that great credibility has meant nothing to kblb's pps...is it because they have failed to capitalize on it?...or couldnt?..either one means something bad...

all these relationships only mean something if kblb can accomplish something with them...

as for kblb's relationship with sial, i think you are exaggerating the relationship by calling it a partnership...

[manshoon1]

Like anything in life, there are these things that I call "positives" and "negatives".

Let me first let you know how big companies get access to $$$$ if they are development stage. They get BANK loans(remember development stage no revenues yet) and PUBLIC share offerings. When a company announces a share offering, that means "more shares hitting the market".....for a legit company, it is not great news, and the PPS goes down.............so what does KBLB do. KBLB in essence has done the same thing, cash for shares + strings attached..........now here is the interesting difference, and it is important to note this. Big development company A PR's the share offering, stock goes down 20 percent(real occurrence), KBLB pr's the new CSC deal....stock price went up, but why? the CSC deal is worse than a share offering...........read the PR, Kim made no mention in the pr of how the CSC deal works, all kim said is that it was funding/credit facility, so anyone completely unaware sees it as essentially a bank loan or credit card, i.e. nothing given in return.

-Yes there are other penny stocks with university involvement.

I just wholeheartedly disagree that this has much in common with the way other pennies act.

but...5 minutes of DD proves otherwise, and that also means you have to know how other pennies act. Separate the science side from the business side. Besides the science the stock behaves exactly like a typical penny stock (fraud or not).
Those similarities revolve around the newsletter pumps. Common sense tells us that someone either employed at KBLB or someone involved is behind the pumps, you don't even have to read disclaimers...... someone with lots of shares wants less shares, that is who is behind every pump EVER, find those with many millions of shares and you will find the one behind the pumps.........you got Kim, Ben, michael mccarthy, sean march, and edward defeudis... Right now I see Ben and Michael as being behind the Swalert action, unless mccarthy and Swalert just magically find Ben everywhere he goes by chance. BUT, Kim did sell 1 million shares during the recent newsletter pump elitestockpics? so common sense says he is probably behind that, with the company paying for the pump that is.......let's just hope that 1 million hare sale by kim was a coincidence with the pump.......if Kim is using company money for a newsletter pump so he can sell shares.............huge huge huge red flag.......the next sec filing should shed light.

You never see the fluff PR's.

That is subjective, I disagree, look back at 2010 pr's and 2008 pr's. And remember a fluffy PR is one that essentially means nothing. Fluffy PR's are done in general to keep the excitement up, very common during pumps(like in September). Compare the sept 7 PR to the sept 13 pr.... there are more, I'll let you do DD to find them.

Kim could do A LOT to give more credibility to KBLB, but he chooses not to.


This stock remains very risky, regardless of ZF's assurances, good companies with good products fail.....so why should a penny stock with an unproven product be almost a guarantee?

Penny stocks are like the Kiosks at the mall...... point being, it doesn't matter if they were selling the holy grail for 10 dollars.....I wouldn't give them 1 second of my attention(kiosks)..so big business generally look at penny stocks the same...it is an uphill battle.