InvestorsHub Logo

RuffRYder

08/07/11 10:46 AM

#33330 RE: 2ez #33329

This company is not involved in doing that.. if you read the previous posts, they don't use living embryos..

rocky301

08/07/11 10:50 AM

#33331 RE: 2ez #33329

yes, you are confused. Try this link and see if it helps you understand.

The early lines developed like MA09..embryo was slated to be discarded
anyway as many are.

"Because the early clinical testing for the retinal cells was conducted on animals using a cell line from an embryo that was discarded, the company is continuing to use that line for its human testing,"
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=63168225

Paulness

08/07/11 12:32 PM

#33332 RE: 2ez #33329

A few weeks ago you seem to have got it correct , are you forgetful ?

2ez Share Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:40:02 AM
Re: cty post# 33246 Post # of 33331

Thanks for the post. I do not approve of killing embryos for science and am happy to know ACTC does not kill embryos. Very interested in the results coming in a few weeks. Could be just what we need to drive this company forward. JMO

bigarow

08/07/11 7:11 PM

#33343 RE: 2ez #33329

ACTC Will be savings lives in a relativly short time.They have many patterns that have life saving potential.