I am not really disputing what you are saying but I don't believe there is any way the weighted was 170M at the end of 2010 when the end of Q1 actual was reported as 343M and Q2 was like 305M I think...I just don't see how the weighted could get that low by the end of the year when the weighted average for the first half was around 320M....What am I missing?
"At the end of the year 2010, the company reported a 'weighted average' OS of 170,833,333.
Assuming that the company was not lying, and because of the reductions that had occured during the year, it is very likely that the actual OS at this time was around 130MM shares.
On July 11, 2011 when HNSS filed its Q1 2011 results, the 'weighted average' OS was stated to be 263,833,333. Again, with the same assumptions, and accounting for the 'weighted average' language, the actual number is likely closer to 280MM shares."