I'm guessing we missed the video with the Japanese marketers.
What demonstrated progress would be satisfactory? Wouldn't this be considered a direct violation (IYHO) of a stringent NDA? This request seems contradictory.
Note that the MOU with Flagman is for the second half of 11'. And yes we are literally the second half with 5 months to go.
We’ll continue to watch in hope, but will invest elsewhere.
What licenses gives the right to speak for other shareholders? I would hope that it is not taken out of context.
FYI the stock has gone up 700% with little warring.