Actually I think we agree in principle umiak :-)
The timing dynamic that seems to be generally accepted is that JBI found and corrected filings and then the SEC came in investigated and then issued the notice. It is equally, if not more so probable, the SEC was the catalyst for the restatements.
Also, voluntary pre-SEC investigation and voluntary post-SEC investigation take on different meanings (of virtue for example), which at minimum, could undermine the shareholder "transparency" notion-- again, a seeming very popular one.