I guess it depends what your definition of 'dishonest' is. Blind stupidity is the best excuse for his case, which isn't really saying much. As I remember he conveniently shut down the 'official forum' a day or two before the company web page went off line and nobody from 'the company' has been heard from since (with an uncharacteristic at the time 600,000 shares or so sold the day he abruptly shut down the official forum with no explanation). Let's just say I doubt he was forthcoming with all that he knew, when he knew it. Again, blind stupidity that if you just believe hard enough everything will be okay is just not an excuse unless he was really a 4 year old child trapped in a mans body. Plus, is it dishonest to promote a scam, and censor and ban any people that question the scam? I guess everyone has their own definition but you can imagine what mine is.
R.I.P. Aurus
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
