InvestorsHub Logo

fung_derf

07/23/11 4:39 PM

#1660 RE: Mr. Zen #1659

So if you haven't read between the lines, the IRP program is not to unearth those who had secretly used the site to pump stocks. It's probably not even about the extra income generated by asking people to disclose and pay a fee. It's all about Ihub covering their butt if they ever get sued. They can now claim that they requested people disclose their paid positions. It's no longer their fault if people fail to comply.
In other words,it's a cop out.

IH Admin [Shelly]

07/23/11 7:12 PM

#1661 RE: Mr. Zen #1659

"In my opinion a complete lack of understanding of the difference between some freelance operator who hustles public company officials for a one week awareness campaign and a member of a public company that answers to the laws and regulations of the SEC and registered with the Canadian Venture Exchange."

Feel free to explain to the SEC their lack of understanding of the distinction and petition them for such. When they choose to separate the two for disclosure purposes, then I'm pretty confident we could make a change here as well.

Btw, it seems there's still some confusion with the current IRPs we have here. They ARE answering the laws and regulations of the SEC by publicly disclosing their compensation here. That's what the IRP program is all about.

"So ends another discussion, maybe consider a change of the name of Investors Hub to pumpers paradise."

A major complaint of yours in the past has been that iHub caters to the bashers...so, which is it? Whichever insult fits your current gripe?

"Sadly, this discussion is closed as far as I am concerned."

Thank you, God.