Power, while i appreciate your enthusiastic regard for SEC legalese, let me suggest, you are essentially wrong.
Legally, we must be careful to understand the meaning of words...exactly.
It is frightfully important in any legal communications to use the proper terminology...this is why you hire lawyers.
"questions"...in this case can reasonably be construed legally as"concerns"....it must be understood, a concern..is legally different from an "allegation".
Until more documentation is made public..they are only "questions..needing to be answered. Easy concept to understand, if we stick to the STRICT definition of words..which were presumably written by SEC legal experts IMO.
Do you understand the legal difference?
IMO..to the extent these "concerns" be resolved..we may see varying levels of results regarding such communications.
It is my great hope, that we all simply wait to see how things FACTUALLY play out...personal speculations,with no documentation is quite frankly, not helpful.