It's a waste of time and gasoline. Why? Read the NSE letter (nicely posted in the iBox next to the pics) and then listen to the NSE conference call.
FACT: Dean Janes is a liar.
Investor Conference Call: 11-1-2010
@ 12:29 into the call:
Caller: Hello Dean.
Dean: Yes.
Caller: Dean, my name is Bob.
Dean: Hi Bob
Caller: Am I correct in assuming and understanding the reasons for the rejection were basically administrative in nature and not substantive in regards to the technology?
Dean: Uhm...you're right on the money. Majority if not all questions were...uhm...mostly about the package and how it was...uhm...uhm...put together, parts that they didn't agree with...uhm...you know again asking for financial information. Where that came from I have no idea. I have to read the relevant...uhm...uh...code that they specified, but really and honestly...uhm...not really one...uhm...question about the technology or its efficacy. It just doesn't make any sense to me. So...uhm...and then some parts they even agree with...you know...what I had presented...uhm...and came up with an irrelevant disagreement with mostly that had to with labeling. But most of the label information that I used were from the devices that...uhm...we were using for the equivalency. So it's just...it really is nonsensical and just about every aspect of what their response is. And...uhm..I'm at a complete loss to understand why this is not approved. I really am. And i think this is giving us...you know... by getting a good consultant group or a legal group in here to take a look at this...uh...I think we're gonna have a very good chance to turn this around and get approval...uhm...much quicker, especially if we are dealing with someone that has alot of clout. Uhm...so that's where I think at this stage of the game it's time to bring in the heavy hitters.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
