InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

catdaddyrt

07/20/11 10:22 AM

#239426 RE: Porgie Tirebiter #239425

I agree 100% - can't trade it with inside info -can't trade it without --it is done -imo most stopped buying it long ago -
icon url

9bruce

07/20/11 12:18 PM

#239438 RE: Porgie Tirebiter #239425

Yes I too agree with you 100%

Information circulated in such a way is to be
avoided.
That Caveat Emptor is good moderating.
B.
icon url

crazy horse 0

07/20/11 12:54 PM

#239441 RE: Porgie Tirebiter #239425

"QASP's glory days as an ATM for flippers are behind it for good. Too much "secret" information has been distributed privately."

Well I agree with that statement !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Caveat Emptor.

People wanting to flip this need to be aware that of lot of information which may or may not be true has been passed around through private communications.

This is bad stuff, as anyone trading on the basis of knowledge which has not been made properly public is guilty of insider trading. Bottom Line: You don't have to be an "insider" to get in trouble here.

QASP's glory days as an ATM for flippers are behind it for good. Too much "secret" information has been distributed privately. I've received it myself. Whether I believe it or not is immaterial. This is no longer legally tradeable for those who have shared this back door information.

Caveat Emptor.


icon url

SLO-sider

07/20/11 4:28 PM

#239453 RE: Porgie Tirebiter #239425

There is no information, shared on iHUB that could be considered "insider", at least not to the point that prosecution would occur. Heck, some of the pinkey CEO's and friends are so guilty of blatant market manipulation that "insider" trading would seem angelic in comparison.

Those of us who have thrown money into QASP have to come to terms with the fact that we were shaken down by the dregs of investing society. We don't have a snowball's chance in hell of seeing any of the perpetrators prosecuted fro their crimes and even a slimmer chance for recouping any part of our "investment".