Replies to post #243456 on ERHC Energy Inc (ERHE)

[stocks2rise]

I have seen it and it was for real. Several even sent DK the link and asked for an explanation and thus his famous "the interpretation must be wrong" statement. He also said he could not comment on what other people put on their website. That is why everyone is so vexed here because they say conflicting things all the time and we do not know what is correct. I agree that there is alot of other junk posted here but that one was for real. I also remember when CNN was talking about the billion barrel find in OBO-1. It was for real also until they put a cone of silence over it.

[Julius Erving]

Slow down Badog, I did see it myself on that website. It's gone now, but it was there (fwiw).

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=54129979

[ERHClongtimer]

badog, not only did we have Sinopec's own English version touting BOMU-1 as commercial, but also English translations of Sinopec's Chinese news release from two other sources:

investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=54203239

Either, (a) someone is trying to hide something, or (b) Sinopec got prematurely optimistic over BOMU-1.

It was a strange incident. - LT

P.S.: If you click on mz157's message to which the post is a reply, you will see the whole exchange with Dan Keeney on the subject.