time for another call into knight securities compliance officer re: size shown on ask at .0003
5,000 is shown but it is a LIE
and since we have new finra regs in for months now specific to sizes shown by MMs' .. the ? becomes why does NITE <knight securities> CONTINUOUSLY LIE about their size shown on exph's ask?
time to make 2 calls .. into finra and nite .. beyond fed up with nite's BS
speaking of lawsuits .. would be nice to see exph shareholders get a class action against knight/nite as they *pertain* to exph
No problem waiting for anyone's "people". I can take care of that for you right now. Expo Holdings, Inc. is legit...a legitimate scam. They are a legitimate front display and cabinet business selling products at a loss to cover the fact their main business is selling shareholder equity in the form of discounted shares to PIPE funders and through PPs and then distributing the money to the principals through G&A expensing. No bank has ever "vetted" Expo for anything creditworthy like auditing their balance sheet to qualify them for a loan or an equity backed line of credit. No bank officer in their right mind would lend this stumbling joke a dime without knowing he or she was in immediate jeopardy of losing their job. Otherwise why would certain entities have to use out of date, meaningless cached websites of bank officers that HAD lost their jobs previously to try desperately to make that "impression" ;-)? Nope...just an endless series of factoring accounts and a couple forklift deals financed with the officer's personal signatures. Stuff a family pet could be made to qualify for under certain manipulative and illegal circumstances.
While Lowes might accurately be described as a "huge company" one might suppose, they have NOT increased any orders to Expo Holdings. There is the original 20K display order which Expo's management has prostituted in every way possible to appear as many different orders over the years, but is still the only one of revenue significance the company ever received. That is not in question...the revenue situation explains everything a thinking investor needs to know about all these supposed "increased orders". Which is simply that that don't and never have existed except in the imaginative, doublespoken prose of Expo's misleading and occasionally outright false PRs.
SEC investigations have to be based on reams of solid evidence before they can even begin. Lawsuits, much the same. What is needed here with Expo Holdings is to concentrate on one person. The sleaziest, greediest, most morally bankrupt and sociopathic mind of the entire lot in the hopes they would do what could normally be expected of such a selfish scumbag; dime out their buds and take the whole sleazebag crew down with them. I think I know who that is and I'll bet a certain person's "people" do too. Once that person is confronted with reality and starts ratting out the nest to save their own keister, all anyone will see of Expo Holdings is an ever more widely radiating pattern of a**holes and elbows as the boyz and girlz from N Wilksboro grab whatever they can lay their hands on and abandon ship at top speed. All of the above is speculation and in my personal opinion but is most likely a lot closer to the truth than anything you'll ever read in an Expo Holdings PR about a "Lowes order increase", lol. All IMHO.
I'm glad some people aren't afraid to put out their guess on EXPO's next move [before knowing of EXPO selling off assets]. I used the June/July date after EXPO diluted another 230 million shares earlier this year [and I put an outside cap of this summer, which everyone knows is June 21 - September 22]. Let's see who comes closer to being correct?! <<< My guess months agoor EXPO's statement that they wouldn't, just this month?! LOL, I'll stick with me.