InvestorsHub Logo

farviewhill

07/06/11 10:02 PM

#32810 RE: rocky301 #32809

My position has always been that unless someone with the expertise could show how we could realistically get our share price up to the lofty numbers folks were throwing around and thus get on a better exchange, even with good clinical news, given our number of OS, then a rs split seemed inevitable and necessary.
Some folks misinterpreted an initial post on this topic, but i clarified my thoughts on the matter in a subsequent post.

I welcome your longevity, due diligence and perspective and would welcome your thoughts on this topic which is on many investors minds.

elichen

07/07/11 4:36 PM

#32845 RE: rocky301 #32809

I don't see what the problem is with a RS. Some people on yahoo board said they hope the company will do that. At least it would get us off the pinks and onto a regulated exchange. So less (at least) naked shorting. What are your objections to a RS?