InvestorsHub Logo

seveb33

07/01/11 10:57 AM

#6746 RE: kingfisher1964 #6745

King

If you really have contacted an attorney, please have them email me. A previous partner of Nicosia has told me some things that I think your attorney will want to hear. The info will of course have to be confirmed or disproveded, but it does effect Vivakor.

richrichrich

07/01/11 1:01 PM

#6747 RE: kingfisher1964 #6745

If it helps you at all, I just checked my history in my account, and I actually received(posted to my account) my ETEV shares, 2/28/11. I did receive my shares several weeks after what was being reported by other shareholders, at that time. If it matters any to you, as far as the "clocking" date for the restriction period, I believe the SEC rules say it begins on the "record" date, which was obviously "earlier"(I believe Jan/2011)........I don't believe there's anything your lawyers will find wrong with the dividend/spinoff, especially if it is at all related to the "multiple" previous record dates "claimed". I've read up on that. Companies do that sort of thing all the time, lie about a dividend. As long as they don't file with FINRA, they can make as many "false" claims as they desire. It's when they make a claim, then file for it with FINRA, that they must "adhere" to the claim, and actually procede forward. This they did(finally), early this year. So good luck if you're trying to find some "slip-up", in that area. I'm hoping you guys involved, find "other" more incriminating evidence of "misbehavior".........I just got off the phone with ETEV's TA, trying to find out about the delays I'm encountering, with my broker. Currently my broker tells me, they need to "break off" my shares, from some sort of "master certificate" they hold, of all shares that were granted to Fidelity, for the dividend. So, once they get that accomplished, I'm hoping I can move forward on the stupid procedures involved..........If you've noticed, all volume on VIVK has kind of "ceased", since the short period where someone(can't blame them) was trying to slowly get rid of some shares, a little bit per day, at .40 cents. I think they got away with about a thousand dollars plus, in selling, before it dropped to .20, making it no longer "worthwhile"(My guess).........I wish there was some sort of SEC ruling for this thing, best described as "Mope-ism". I mostly hate that the VIVK has been "abandoned" completely, from way before the RS, and especially since the RS, with no shred of hope for any "miracle" recovery, ever..........This has been accomplshed by a MOPE of a CEO, with generally zero consideration, for the shareholders. I'd probably be happy, if that man sent all shareholders a dust covered bottle of Vivablend, as compensation..........

Goucho79

07/01/11 4:29 PM

#6748 RE: kingfisher1964 #6745

2/16/11

I really appreciate you following through with the lawyers, but do you really think anything will happen? I feel like we'd have more success if we lobbied our congressman for stricter laws to regulate these types of shell companies. After all my numerous complaints to FINRA, FTC, SEC and every other number that I was referred to, I've just about given up. Nobody cares... the system has a severe flaw that allows people like Nicosia to prosper. There are no laws that say statements in PR have to happen. Even if we got our RGNA shares, they will be worth nothing. Our restricted shares are probably the only reason the stock hasn't hit .0001 like VIVK... I'm sure that's why they won't give us a date they will be tradeable.

Matt should feel lucky that investors haven't found him... the judicial system should be the least of his worries.