I wasn't arguing anything. You said the stock cycles a certain
way & although the PERCEPTION may be so it has not done as you
say. Similarly, the stock's share structure is NOT necessarily the
problem AS MUCH AS the CEO's historical PROPENSITY to DILUTE
shareholders.
In addition, ANY move must be viewed in light of the new
MORE MASSIVE share structure which will NOT be so easy to move!!
(at 6Billion shares) NOT TO MENTION the 4Billion he still has
available, & as I have said-- is INCLINED to USE!!!
No argument, just the facts as it related to the history of this
stock. It could change...but I wouldn't put my money on it.